You've gotta be cruel to be kind, said the poet—and it turns out to be especially true in the case of the Canadian commercial seal hunt, wherein, as I explain in my latest National Post column, politicians are contemplating steps contrary to animal welfare for the sake of appearing more humane.
Comments (5)
That's you in a nutshell, Cosh.
Triangulating a controversial topic to come up with a point we find, at best, only intriguing.
Posted by okhropir rumiani | April 21, 2008 6:47 PM
Posted on April 21, 2008 18:47
That's you in a nutshell, Cosh.
Triangulating a controversial topic to come up with a point we find, at best, only intriguing.
Listen; bottom line: opponents of the seal hunt want it stopped, period.
Posted by okhropir rumiani | April 21, 2008 6:49 PM
Posted on April 21, 2008 18:49
Listen; bottom line: opponents of the seal hunt want it stopped, period.
Perhaps, but what you're going to get is extra animal cruelty, apparently. If that's only "intriguing," then I wonder why you're an opponent of the seal hunt in the first place.
Posted by John Thacker | April 21, 2008 7:34 PM
Posted on April 21, 2008 19:34
Who's this "we" of whom you speak? I find it pretty funny: but then I'm a sucker for the law of unintended consequences.
Posted by DSM | April 22, 2008 10:14 AM
Posted on April 22, 2008 10:14
"politicians are contemplating steps contrary to animal welfare for the sake of appearing more humane."
Hmm, strangely reminiscent of politicians who wanted to leave Saddam in power and the sanctions regime in place so Iraq wouldn't suffer as it has since we invaded.
Posted by Mike G | April 26, 2008 11:35 AM
Posted on April 26, 2008 11:35